Chuck Swiger wrote: > Mark Kirkwood wrote: > >> Chuck Swiger wrote: >> >>> FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE i386 >>> null function: 0.01278 >>> getpid(): 0.51329 >>> time(): 2.54771 >>> gettimeofday(): 2.54982 >>> >> >> Chuck - very interesting results. I happen to have a PIII 1Ghz running >> 5.4-RELEASE so thought it would be interesting to reproduce your >> numbers. My null and getpid pretty much do, but the time functions >> seem much quicker on my machine - some sort of regression in >> 5.4-STABLE maybe? >> >> null function: 0.01578 >> getpid(): 0.49136 >> time(): 0.83031 >> gettimeofday(): 0.78838 >> >> However, we are still slower than Linux :-(. > > > Interesting. The 5.4 box was a Dell PowerEdge 2550 with a 933 Mhz P3, I > think IIRC :-), running a kernel & world that's about two months old. > >> [Running a pretty much stock kernel, except for: >> >> #cpu I486_CPU >> #cpu I586_CPU >> >> and timer.c is compiled w/o any optimization.] > > > That's about what my kernel looks like, and I compiled using nothing but > "cc -o timer timer.c" as well. > To add to the confusion :-), here are results from a dual PIII 1G (Tyan S2510) running 6.0-RC1 (minus all debugging and malloc checking): null function: 0.01143 getpid(): 0.51563 time(): 5.27039 gettimeofday(): 5.24489 Interesting - kinda like the 5.4-STABLE results (but 2x slower for time....). Again a pretty stock kernel ('options SMP' added obviously). regards MarkReceived on Thu Oct 27 2005 - 23:03:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:46 UTC