Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Chuck - very interesting results. I happen to have a PIII 1Ghz running > 5.4-RELEASE so thought it would be interesting to reproduce your > numbers. My null and getpid pretty much do, but the time functions seem > much quicker on my machine - some sort of regression in 5.4-STABLE maybe? > > null function: 0.01578 > getpid(): 0.49136 > time(): 0.83031 > gettimeofday(): 0.78838 > > However, we are still slower than Linux :-(. > > [Running a pretty much stock kernel, except for: > > #cpu I486_CPU > #cpu I586_CPU > > and timer.c is compiled w/o any optimization.] Does polling affect to this test? I get: null function: 0.01060 getpid(): 0.41378 time(): 0.66705 gettimeofday(): 0.64459 FreeBSD 6.0-BETA5 #1: Sun Oct 9 13:09:23 EEST 2005 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(TM)Processor (1009.95-MHz 686-class CPU) # Enable Polling options DEVICE_POLLING # Timecounter "i8254" options HZ=2299Received on Fri Oct 28 2005 - 07:33:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:46 UTC