On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, 21:28-0800, Cai, Quanqing wrote: > >> Today I happened to read this message on freebsd-stable: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-October/019086.html >> >> After I read all messages and related links, I feel so frustrating, >> why nobody take serious to fix this bug even we have a patch for it? >> I can repeat this bug on 7.0-CURRENT and 6.0-RC1 easily as a normal >> user! System goes no response so I have to power cycle it. The patch >> made by Uwe Doering actually works well. This bug looks like a >> security hole to me:( If you guys don't like this patch, please give >> out a reason and come out a better patch or solution. > > I was told the patch is incorrect. It works in certain cases but > incorrect in general. Why is it incorrect ? I'm using it for year. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/Received on Mon Oct 31 2005 - 12:27:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:46 UTC