On 2005-09-06 09:32, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc_at_crodrigues.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:45:08PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > I don't really like the "hackish" way my last patch avoids the panics, because > > assuming that a default font_width of 8 is ok is probably one gratuitous > > assumption too many. I haven't had a chance to look at the font changing > > implementation to see if scp->font_width can be set elsewhere to a non-zero > > value or if it's supposed to be zero in text modes. > > Can you try this: > > Index: scvidctl.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/syscons/scvidctl.c,v > retrieving revision 1.35 > diff -u -u -r1.35 scvidctl.c > --- scvidctl.c 30 Aug 2005 18:58:16 -0000 1.35 > +++ scvidctl.c 6 Sep 2005 13:31:30 -0000 > _at__at_ -145,6 +145,8 _at__at_ > return ENODEV; > > /* adjust argument values */ > + if (fontwidth <= 0) > + fontwidth = info.vi_cwidth; > if (fontsize <= 0) > fontsize = info.vi_cheight; > if (fontsize < 14) { This looks promising. I'll try it out, after reverting my local patch in a while. Thanks :)Received on Tue Sep 06 2005 - 12:03:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:42 UTC