Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:42:16 -0400

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:39:32PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 
> > And you enabled the correct KTR options in your kernel, right?
> 
> options KTR
> options KTR_COMPILE=KTR_SCHED
> options KTR_MASK

options KTR_MASK=KTR_SCHED, per the instructions in schedgraph.py

Kris

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Fri Sep 16 2005 - 13:42:19 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule"
Previous message: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule"
In reply to: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule"
Next in thread: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule"
Reply: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:43 UTC