Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule

From: Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:13:32 +0530

ol> Wow, that update to BETA4 did the trick! While running 
ol> SCHED_4BSD:

Fantastic!  What is the profile like with the new 4BSD kernel?

I'm still puzzled as to how the ULE kernel managed to avoid
the bug.

-- 
FreeBSD Volunteer,     http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy

Received on Sat Sep 17 2005 - 00:43:33 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alexander Nedotsukov: "GDB warning message."
Previous message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64"
In reply to: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule"
Next in thread: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule"
Reply: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:43 UTC