On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:36:09 -0400 Martin Cracauer <cracauer_at_cons.org> wrote: > > I'm wondering why you get problems. Don't create a dev directory at all > > and the kernel should fall back to the native one. > > This is for chrooted environments which don't fall back. Ok, valid point. > It seemes that the controlled procfs mounting is the solution. In my > case I don't chroot for security reasons, just to get the FreeBSD libs > and programs out of the way, so I don't even have to secure the second > mount. Yes, multiple devfs mounts are the way to go. Or mount linprocfs... > The documentation for this procedure should probably get into the > chroot manpage. It's at least documented in the man page for creating jails... I think. > What would be your idea of a proper Linux environment? They move > faster than I can follow :-) 8 is the default. If you don't have something which depends upon a newer one, use the default. A lot of people use rh-9 (OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=rh9 in make.conf), but the port has some flaws and Trevor doesn't react. I think I will claim a maintainer timeout soon (perhaps at the weekend if I get time) and fix some things (runtime linker path if you want to use the X11 libs). I don't use it myself, but I haven't heard very bad things about it. Bye, Alexander. -- The best things in life are free, but the expensive ones are still worth a look. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7Received on Tue Sep 20 2005 - 17:24:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:43 UTC