On 27 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: > Probably the easiest fix would be to call runningbufwakeup() from > ffs_copyonwrite() before grabbing "snaplk", and increase runningbufspace > again before returning from ffs_copyonwrite(). The bufs waiting for > "snaplk" aren't yet async writes currently running, to borrow from the > comment on waitrunningbufspace(). Sleeping on "wdrain" is probably also undesirable if a thread holds "snaplk" because of the potential impact on the activity of other threads. A possible fix would be for bufwrite() to skip the call to waitrunningbufspace() if the thread holds "snaplk". This might cause problems with queuing an excessive amount of I/O, but I don't think so because the outer bufwrite() will still call waitrunningbufspace().Received on Wed Sep 28 2005 - 05:26:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:44 UTC