Re: devfs ruleset 4 (jails)

From: Raphael H. Becker <rabe_at_p-i-n.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:27:15 +0200
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:54:17AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 March 2006 11:32, Raphael H. Becker wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 06:07:05PM +0200, Raphael H. Becker wrote:
> > > PS: the box crashed just while writing this (while using devfs
> > > <something>) so I'll need to powercycle it before leaving my office.
> > crash:
[...]
> > I don't know much about the debugger, so I just resetted the box by
> > typing "reset" at the prompt.
> > Hope that helps a little.
> Well, it means that it's broken in HEAD as well at least.

Is there a workaround to hide "critical" devices from a mounted devfs?
... any patches to test?

>From my point of view this is a critical situation for machines with
jails and "foreign" roots in them while I (host admin) cannot hide disk
devices (and other critical stuff) from the jails. 

Regrads
Raphael Becker
Received on Wed Apr 05 2006 - 12:27:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:54 UTC