Scott Long wrote: > The ISO image is valid, but we didn't do things like bump the version > numbers, tag CVS, or build ports. I hand-edited the .TXT files > available from FTP, but the same files in the ISO are the stock 2.2.8 > ones. However, the release was built from the RELENG_2_2 tree, so it > actually does incorporate the small handful of changes that went in > after the 2.2.8 tag was laid down. It was a fun little trip in the > Way-Back machine, and the announcement email was meant to poke some fun > at that. > Btw, Ruslan Ermilov was the creative force behind all of this, he > deserves 99% of the credit. Hi Scott, cc list Thanks for explanation, perhaps you might create ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/2.2.9/CHECKSUM.MD5 with MD5 (2.2.9-RELEASE.iso) = fba4c8fa17bf9d8210a0989ca6cc57f9 perhaps appending your text summary above to eg ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/2.2.9/README -- Julian Stacey. Consultant Unix Net & Sys. Eng., Munich. http://berklix.com Mail in Ascii, HTML=spam. Ihr Rauch = meine allergischen Kopfschmerzen.Received on Fri Apr 07 2006 - 08:00:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:54 UTC