On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Julian Elischer wrote: > Csaba Henk wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:10:56AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> >>> Only between libthr and libpthread. libc_r doesn't have symbol >>> versioning. >>> >> >> That's sad -- given, as noted elsewhere, libc_r is the best suitable >> for tracing. >> >> Will it remain like this or can we expect a symver'd libc_r >> in due time? >> >> Regards, >> Csaba >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >> > Dan, maybe we can make an option where libc_r degrades down to one kse > somehow > then it would probable be more traceable. You mean like: $ sudo sysctl kern.threads.virtual_cpu=1 and, or $ LIBPTHREAD_PROCESS_SCOPE=yes; export LIBPTHREAD_PROCESS_SCOPE ?? -- DEReceived on Fri Apr 07 2006 - 16:37:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:54 UTC