Am 16.04.2006 um 02:26 schrieb Andrew Thompson: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 02:05:00AM +0200, Thomas Vogt wrote: >> Am 16.04.2006 um 01:17 schrieb Kevin Oberman: >>> The box was running 6.1-BETA from March 13 and Postfix 2.2.10 and >>> uses >>> TLS. The one unusual thing about the system is that it receives mail >>> from our organizational server via IPv6 only. >>> >>> Smells a bit like a timing issue in the rc code, but I really am >>> only >>> guessing. >> >> I can confirm this behavior also for 5.4 machines (postfix-2.2.5,1). >> On some of my server postfix does not start after a reboot on other >> it does start. All server are identical in software releases except >> hardware. > > Are you using the right startup method? > > /usr/ports/UPDATING: > > 20060112: > AFFECTS: users of mail/postfix, mail/postfix1, mail/postfix21, > mail/postfix-current > AUTHOR: mnag_at_FreeBSD.org > > Now all postfix ports use rcNG script to startup. If you have any > file > in etc/rc.d directory linked to sbin/postfix, please remove. > Do not forget to add 'postfix_enable="YES"' in your rc.conf I don't use the methode mentioned in /ports/UPDATING 2006. I use postfix 2.2.5 which was released in October 2005 and my system is a FreeBSD 5.4-Release-pX (security branch). So I guess the new startup methode doesn't affect my system because the rcNG script for postfix was implemented later..or am I wrong? I use: # we have postfix sendmail_enable="YES" sendmail_flags="-bd" sendmail_pidfile="/var/spool/postfix/pid/master.pid" sendmail_procname="/usr/local/libexec/postfix/master" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" Regards, Thomas VogtReceived on Sat Apr 15 2006 - 23:01:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:54 UTC