>> jemalloc. From the backtrace, t's doing a TLS allocation, where I'm >> certain phkmalloc didn't do anything like that. > > Indeed, jemalloc does add a dependency on TLS for PIC versions, though > it can be configured to run (more slowly) without TLS, as Marcel pointed > out. This appears to be a bug in the TLS implementation, rather than in > jemalloc; the appropriate fix is to make TLS work. Exactly. I was pointing out the difference, sorry if it appeared to be putting blame on jemalloc. later, Peter.Received on Fri Aug 04 2006 - 18:54:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:58 UTC