Re: Where is thr_getscheduler

In message: <20060802165604.GA970_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
            Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes:
: On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:42:55AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 02:38:03PM -0700 I heard the voice of
: > Steve Kargl, and lo! it spake thus:
: > > 
: > > If UPDATING had a proper notice,
: > 
: > If UPDATING had a notice every time a {library,program} in 7 did
: > something that wasn't supported by 6 (for various values of 7 and 6),
: > it would be a very, very long and very boring file.
: > 
: 
: Sigh. We go through this every time someone bumps libc's
: version number without bumping the version numbers of 
: all other libraries.  There is significant difference
: bewteen changing libgpib.so version number and changing
: libc.so version number.  Changeing libc's version number
: should have been noted in UPDATING.

Yes.  And we shouldn't be bumping libc in current unless we also turn
symbol versioning on at the same time...

: The version number of libthr should have been bumped
: when David Xu committed his change. 
: 
: Last time I checked there were several integers between 2 and
: INT_MAX.  Is there some sort of shortage of integers at
: freebsd.org that prevents bumping libthr.so.2 to libthr.so.3?

We do try to only bump one per major release...

Warner