On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 05:01:20PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Peter Holm wrote: > > >While stress testing GENERIC HEAD from Aug 12 12:55 UTC I got this > >panic: > > > >panic: mutex nfsd_mtx not owned at > >../../../nfsserver/nfs_srvsock.c:148 > >cpuid = 2 > >KDB: enter: panic > >[thread pid 761 tid 100096 ] > >Stopped at kdb_enter+0x2b: nop > >db> where > >Tracing pid 761 tid 100096 td 0xc4041a20 > >kdb_enter(c091cda8) at kdb_enter+0x2b > >panic(c091c0b7,c09210c9,c093241d,94,0,...) at panic+0x14b > >_mtx_assert(c0a64ec0,1,c093241d,94,c07ec53c,...) at _mtx_assert+0x66 > >nfs_rephead(0,c52a0600,48,e662e964,e662e968,...) at nfs_rephead+0x25 > >nfsrv_symlink(c52a0600,c4071e00,c4041a20,e662ec40) at > >nfsrv_symlink+0x3b7 > >nfssvc_nfsd(c4041a20) at nfssvc_nfsd+0x409 > >nfssvc(c4041a20,e662ed04) at nfssvc+0x18c > >syscall(3b,3b,3b,1,0,...) at syscall+0x256 > > > >More details _at_ http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/cons204.html > > Could you use gdb to generate frame debugging information for the frame > above nfs_rephead() (nfsrv_symlink()) also, please? I'm a bit puzzled as > to how things got into this state, as under normal circumstances, > nfsm_reply() is the source of the nfs_rephead() call, and the NFS mutex is > acquired the line before the call to nfsm_reply(). > cons204.html has been updated with info from frame 12. - Peter > Thanks, > > Robert N M Watson > Computer Laboratory > University of CambridgeReceived on Tue Aug 15 2006 - 15:49:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC