On Wed, 2006-Aug-16 13:25:39 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >Quoting Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy_at_optushome.com.au> (from Wed, 16 Aug >2006 19:06:53 +1000): > >>On Wed, 2006-Aug-16 00:23:28 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>>For the curious ones: the code is "activated" by changing osrelease, ... >It's mentioned in /usr/ports/UPDATING (as in: make sure you don't >change the default osrelease). I found it by grepping for osrelease. The comment is buried in the FC4 update and not immediately obvious. I was thinking of it being documented in (eg) linux(4). >The intend is to change the default value to 2.6.x when the code is >stable enough. What is the plan for the 2.4.x code? Will it be maintained (in which case, this should be documented), left to rot or explicitly deleted? -- Peter Jeremy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC