Re: suggested addition to 'date'

From: Oliver Fromme <olli_at_lurza.secnetix.de>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 13:04:45 +0200 (CEST)
Antony Mawer wrote:
 > Oliver Fromme wrote:
 > > PS:  Personally I would recommend installing gnu-awk (it
 > > was formerly part of the FreeBSD base system, but it was
 > > replaced by a crippled awk, unfortunately), instead of
 > > hacking date.  I always install gnu-awk because it's so
 > > useful.
 > 
 > That's a bit drastic. Wouldn't be more sensible to encourage someone to 
 > add the same feature to our BSD-variety awk?

I apologize, my words were probably a bit harsh.  I'm
very sorry for that.

I agree that it would be useful to add strftime() to
our version of awk.  I would be willing to implement
it myself and send-pr a patch (i.e.: yes, I volunteer),
but only if such a feature would be accepted and
commited.  I wouldn't like to spend time on a patch
and then be refused because it's just regarded as
bloat ...

Best regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme,  secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing
Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.

"Clear perl code is better than unclear awk code; but NOTHING
comes close to unclear perl code"  (taken from comp.lang.awk FAQ)
Received on Sat Aug 19 2006 - 09:05:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC