Hi Michael, On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:26:18PM +0400, Michael Bushkov wrote: > This issue turned to be more complex than I originally expected. I > believe that "not having 2 different entities in the system, that do the > same thing" is the good rule. So maybe, leaving libldap.so(a) in > /usr/lib is not an absolutely good decision. But renaming libldap to > some other name and leaving it there (and enforcing everything beside > the base system to use almost the same ports' libldap) is probably much > more worse. > So, after all, I'd prefer to leave libldap (and nss_ldap, which can also > conflict with PADL's nss_ldap) as is and let users use WITHOUT_LDAP and > WITHOUT_NSS_LDAP when appropriate. Besides, this avoids to break POLA IMHO. If OpenLDAP has to be imported (is it something sure now ?), I strongly expect libldap to have its real name, as other imported softwares. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >Received on Tue Aug 22 2006 - 19:00:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC