Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC)

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:46:40 +0200
Alexander Leidinger <Alexander_at_Leidinger.net> writes:
> Michael Bushkov <bushman_at_rsu.ru> writes:(from Tue, 22 Aug 2006
> > So, after all, I'd prefer to leave libldap (and nss_ldap, which can
> > also conflict with PADL's nss_ldap) as is and let users use
> > WITHOUT_LDAP and WITHOUT_NSS_LDAP when appropriate.
> If someone doesn't like the base system libldap, but wants the
> nss_ldap stuff, this way will not work out. While building the base
> system, no 3rd party libs are known to the build infrastructure.

Wrong.  It is already possible in today's tree to build the base
system's Kerberos with OpenLDAP support using the OpenLDAP port, and
there are similar provisions for using OpenSSL from ports.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no
Received on Wed Aug 23 2006 - 09:46:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC