Cardbus problem

Hi,

I have had a problem using the ndis driver for my wireless cardbus 
adapter since I updated current in April.

The wireless card is an Alloy WLT245401 model with a Texas Instruments 
chipset.

With a current from November 2005, I used the wireless adapter 
successfully.

I updated current yesterday and still no joy:
FreeBSD priscilla.gsoft.com.au 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #7: Wed 
Aug 23 08:34:10 CST 2006 
root_at_priscilla.gsoft.com.au:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PRISCILLA  i386


When I insert the wireless card, I see the following in /var/log/messages:

Aug 21 18:29:53 priscilla kernel: cardbus0: CIS pointer is 0x1c02
Aug 21 18:29:53 priscilla kernel: cardbus0: CIS in BAR 0x14
Aug 21 18:29:53 priscilla kernel: cardbus0: Expecting link target, got 0x8
Aug 21 18:29:53 priscilla kernel: cardbus0: Warning: Bogus CIS ignored
Aug 21 18:29:53 priscilla kernel: ndis0: <IEEE 802.11g Wireless 
Cardbus/PCI Adapter> mem 0xf2020000-0xf203ffff,0xf2002000-0xf2003fff at 
device 0.0 on cardbus0
Aug 21 18:29:53 priscilla kernel: ndis0: NDIS API version: 5.1
Aug 21 18:29:53 priscilla kernel: ndis0: init handler failed
Aug 21 18:29:53 priscilla kernel: device_attach: ndis0 attach returned 6


pciconf says:
cbb0_at_pci2:15:0: class=0x060700 card=0x00a41028 chip=0xac42104c rev=0x00 
hdr=0x02
     vendor   = 'Texas Instruments (TI)'
     device   = 'PCI4451 PC card CardBus Controller'
     class    = bridge
     subclass = PCI-CardBus
cbb1_at_pci2:15:1: class=0x060700 card=0x00a41028 chip=0xac42104c rev=0x00 
hdr=0x02
     vendor   = 'Texas Instruments (TI)'
     device   = 'PCI4451 PC card CardBus Controller'
     class    = bridge
     subclass = PCI-CardBus
ndis0_at_pci5:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x9067104c chip=0x9066104c rev=0x00 
hdr=0x00
     vendor   = 'Texas Instruments (TI)'
     device   = 'TNETW1130(ACX111) 802.11b/g Wireless Cardbus/PCI Adapter'
     class    = network

I wound back the versions of the cardbus module. The wireless card 
worked again when I made a cardbus module dated < December 29, 2005. If 
I advance further than that I get the problem above.

Does anyone else have this problem?

Regards, Adrian