On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Brooks Davis wrote: >> Well, maybe more compromise solution will be to have OpenLDAP and nss_ldap >> in the base, but to have them turned off by default, so the user would need >> to specify WITH_LDAP and WITH_NSS_LDAP in the make.conf to build them. >> More, if the user don't want to have OpenLDAP built with the base, but >> wants nss_ldap there, he'd have the ability to link nss_ldap against the >> ports. And we should also have rewritten nss_ldap in ports (call it >> nss_ldap_bsd, for example). IMHO, It's quite a flexible scheme that should >> satisfy most number of users. My main concern with such solution is: will >> it affect the capability of installing OpenLDAP and nss_ldap out of the >> box? > > I really think we need it on the install CD which realisticly means it needs > to build by default. We could potentially pack it up like kerberos in the > install process, but I'm not sure that's really necessicary. We actually don't even do that anymore -- we build Kerbreros5 support by default now. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of CambridgeReceived on Thu Aug 24 2006 - 13:53:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC