Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > Hello! > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > 2589 case O_IP_SRC_ME: > > 2590 if (is_ipv4) { > > 2591 struct ifnet *tif; > > 2592 > > 2593 INADDR_TO_IFP(src_ip, tif); > > 2594 match = (tif != NULL); > > 2595 } > > Looks like a lack of the proper locking against IP address > addition/removal. These (O_IP_SRC_ME/O_IP_DST_ME), > as well as matching of interface by IP address in the iface_match(): > > /* XXX lock? */ > TAILQ_FOREACH(ia, &ifp->if_addrhead, ifa_link) { > if (ia->ifa_addr == NULL) > continue; > > are worrying for these races exist since version 1.1 of the ip_fw2.c > for more than 4 years! Alas I'm not an expert in kernel locking, that's why > I don't know how to correctly lock these places. I was surprised that I'm not seeing this on my other firewall because it has 34* the packet rate, but now that I think about it, this is an SMP machine and the other one with higher load is UP so locking would be more of an issue here. Ian -- Ian FreislichReceived on Tue Aug 29 2006 - 07:21:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC