On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 09:59:36PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:33:36 -0700, Steve Kargl > <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:29:16PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:04:47 -0700, Steve Kargl > > > <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:50:22PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Incidentally, I've been wondering for the longest time now: > > > > > is/are there any particular reason(s) why we exclude gcj from > > > > > the gcc tree/build? Sure would be a cool thing to have. > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) It's not needed to build anything in the base system. > > > > 2) It takes a long time to build. > > > > 3) You really want to use the gcc41 or gcc42 port. > > > > > > > > Of course, IMHO. > > > > > > I've tried both ports, but gcj fails to run, complaining about a > > > missing "spec" file (I forget the exact filename, maybe > > > "gcjlib.spec" or something similar). :-( > > > > > > Is this maybe an arch-specific (amd64) problem? Or? > > > > > > > Contact Gerald. He is fairly quick at addressing port > > issues. I don't build the ports because I build GCC > > svn sources for 4.1.x and trunk several times a week. > > I'll note that I don't normally build gjc. I can try > > a bootstrap tomorrow. > > OK, will do. Thanks. For those interesting in bootstrap time. % time gmake bootstrap 4456.51 real 4098.55 user 349.61 sys This includes C, C++, Fortran, and Java. These numbers are from a dual-processor, dual-core opteron system running at 2.4 GHz and with 16 GB of memory. The system was otherwise idle. -- SteveReceived on Wed Aug 30 2006 - 17:17:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC