On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 10:38:54AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Rene Ladan wrote: > > >Marcus Alves Grando schreef: > >>Hi list, > >> > >>I make compat6x port. If someone need or can help to test, please > >>download shar here: > >> > >>http://marcus.grupos.com.br:8080/patch/compat6x.shar > >> > >>Any feedback are welcome. > >> > >Would this be a nice opportunity to bump the version of libpthread.so ? > > Se the other thread(s) in current about that. In short, > yes we have to bump libpthread.so but it should be done > along with bumping all libraries. But even in all those other threads, never had there been a decent answer why it is good to have two incompatible libraries with the same number. It can only cause hurt. I still vote for bumping lib versions as soon as we do something that cause them to be incompatible with the same versioned one in a release. Having api churn in a lib version that is only available in -current is much more acceptable that churning a lib that have the same version as one in a release. John -- John Hay -- John.Hay_at_meraka.csir.co.za / jhay_at_FreeBSD.orgReceived on Sun Dec 03 2006 - 05:16:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:03 UTC