Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > [resequenced] > > On Friday, 8 December 2006 at 17:15:49 -0600, Derek Ragona wrote: >> At 04:45 PM 12/8/2006, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We're running around 25 FBSD servers, mostly 6 and a few 5-STABLE. For a >>> few months, we also run our internal storage/smb/whatnot machine on >>> -current. Never had ANY issues. Just works, and better than 6-*. >>> >>> Now, we are about to replace our MX's and I'm thinking of deploying >>> -current on them instead of upcoming 6.2. Right now running tests on the >>> hardware, two ProLiant DL360G3 cpu's and everything looks just fine. >>> >>> Am I an idiot or is anyone else out there running -current on production >>> systems? I figured if one MX goes haywire at least we've got another >>> one... Very interested in your opinion. >> Best practices are to run only stable on production servers. > > I used to run CURRENT on my machines all the time. The main reason I > stopped was not reliability, but the fact that CURRENT changes so > frequently. Time to upgrade the system is also down time. > > At the other end of the scale, I have one machine which runs my beer > brewing and is now 6 years old: > > FreeBSD brewer.lemis.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Tue Dec 12 18:45:30 CST 2000 grog_at_monorchid.lemis.com:/src/FreeBSD/5.0-CURRENT/src/sys/compile/MONORCHID i386 > > I've never had software problems with it. Hmm, yes, I think I forgot to mention we're stll on FOUR- in fact, this is our adminstration server. No problems here either. FreeBSD cassidy.i.inter-sonic.com 4.11-STABLE FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE #0: Wed Nov 1 13:46:17 CET 2006 peo_at_cassidy.i.inter-sonic.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CASSIDY i386Received on Fri Dec 08 2006 - 23:14:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:03 UTC