Re: CURRENT freezes on Laitude D520

From: Tai-hwa Liang <avatar_at_mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:11:40 +0800 (CST)
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
[...]
> Right now, setting debug.mpsafenet=1 has three effects:
>
> (1) Place Giant over the network stack, creating a single lock that spans the
>    entire stack, preventing parallelism, as well as acting as a "master" 
> lock
>    which implicitly prevents lock order-related deadlocks in the stack.
>
> (2) Effectively disabling preemption in the network stack, as ithreads and 
> the
>    netisr will be unable to start running until user threads exit the stack,
>    regardless of priority.
>
> (3) Effectively disable direct dispatch, as non-MPSAFE netisr handlers are
>    always deferred rather than executing in the ithread context.
>
> I suspect that many of the people setting debug.mpsafenet=1 and declaring the 
> problem fixed are seeing the change due to (2) and (3), indirect rather than 
> direct effects of (1).  I would much rather people experimented with:
>
> - Disabling direct dispatch (net.isr.direct=0)
>
> - Disabling preemption (compiling out options PREEMPTION)
>
> - Running with WITNESS, which reports lock order reversals.
>
> which get a bit more to the heart of most problems.  debug.mpsafenet=1 really 
> exists for the purposes of supporting components which are not sufficiently 
> locked to allow the stack to run MPSAFE, rather than as a means of disabling 
> direct dispatch and preemption, which speak to different types of problems. 
> The main reason that I haven't removed the administrator tunable to date is 
> that I suspect it will be quite helpful when KAME IPSEC locking happens, but 
> since that appears not to have happened yet, debug.mpsafenet as an option is 
> likely causing more harm than good by being available as a stand-in sysctl 
> masking other problems, causing people to not get to the point of properly 
> identifying the actual cause (device driver bugs, etc).

   Can the aforementioned tricks(1/2/3) being applied to RELENG_6 as well?

   We are using RELENG_6 as our production server(postfix, squid,
pf firewall/NAT, FAST_IPSEC VPN, ...), which is a dual Athlon MP board
with three NICs(two fxp cards and one onboard xl, connected to three
different networks).

   I haven't try WITNESS, yet; however, I'm very sure that net.isr.direct=0
plus that there is no PREEMPTION in current kernel.  The problem is that,
with debug.mpsafenet=1, we'll always run into hard freeze w/o having any
kdb> prompt on console.

   Whilst turning debug.mpsafenet off only masks the real problem, I'm still
wondering about if there is any less damaging way to track such problem
down in a _production_ environment.

-- 
Thanks,

Tai-hwa Liang
Received on Sun Dec 10 2006 - 02:11:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:03 UTC