Re: Let's use gcc-4.2, not 4.1 -- OpenMP

From: Ivan Voras <ivoras_at_fer.hr>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:30:14 +0100
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 04:35:41PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:

>> For what it's worth: +1. It's going to be practically required even for
>> medium-performance applications as CPU clock rate stagnate and more
>> cores are grown. I've recently seen a 16-cpu x86 server in 1U! (granted,
>> 8 of those are hyperthreaded "CPUs" ;) )
> 
> and the other 8 are overheated CPUs ?

I see you're familiar with that product line :)
Received on Thu Dec 14 2006 - 15:32:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:03 UTC