Re: Let's use gcc-4.2, not 4.1 -- OpenMP

From: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:50:30 +1030
On Friday 15 December 2006 05:50, Scott Long wrote:
> Yes, the industry moves fast, but that's no reason to fool ourselves
> into thinking that the FSF will support GCC 4.2 a day after they release
> 4.3 and start working on 4.4.  Your point above about the lifespan of
> FreeBSD 7.x is a valid one, and I agree that it should be a
> consideration.  Vendor support is a myth and should not be a
> consideration.

Not to mention it is *trivial* to install a compiler using ports or packages.

If you are serious about high performance computing installing a new compiler 
is about the lowest barrier you'll find.

(Unless of course you need all the libraries compiled with OpenMP support 
before your binary can use it)

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

Received on Fri Dec 15 2006 - 03:21:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:03 UTC