On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 01:24:59PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > control implementation is structured. A bug in the new ipcperm() may well > be triggering the appearance of the error, but it appears also to be a > product of incorrectly structured code in the existing shared memory > implementation. The long-term goal is to have a correct implementation of > the new code, not simply revert to the old code. Well, in case t-shm tests will pass, any re-structuring will be fine for me. > >>failure. It could be that both a bug in ipcperm() and a big in shmget() > > > >I'll try to make ktrace output, a bit later. > > That's not what I asked for. In that case I'll be delayed for a longer time - right now -current is not bootable - fatal trap due to kmacy_at_ changes. -- http://ache.pp.ru/Received on Sat Dec 16 2006 - 12:41:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC