David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 07:14:53PM +0100, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > > > CPU: AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2700+ (2166.44-MHz 686-class CPU) > .. > > Settings/Compiler | gcc-3.4 | gcc-4.1 | gcc-4.2 > > ----------------------------+---------+---------+--------- > > -O2 | 6.46s | 6.67s | 6.38s > > -O2 -funroll-loops | 4.44s | 4.16s | 4.02s > > -O2 -march=athlon-xp -fun.. | 4.39s | 4.38s | 4.26s > > -O3 | 6.14s | 5.23s | 5.16s > > -O3 -funroll-loops | 4.24s | 4.87s | 4.95s > > -O3 -march=athlon-xp -fun.. | 4.19s | 4.90s | 5.07s > > A fine example that -O3 isn't always better than -O2. > I wonder if you're blowing the L2 cache. IIRC, all Athlon XP 2700+ > are the Thoughbread core, which has only 256KB L2. I'd be very much interested in -Os numbers. It should help with the cache ... Ulrich Spoerlein -- A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? > >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?Received on Sun Dec 17 2006 - 13:50:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC