Something that, in my opinion, may have been missed in all of this, Why, exactly, do you want to run -CURRENT in production? As others have said above, its certainly possible to do. I've done it before myself, but always because of a specific feature, or bit of supported hardware, that didn't exist in -STABLE. Running -CURRENT is quite a bit more work than running -STABLE. The fact that a -CURRENT kernel and world can build and run on a test system, does little to indicate what type of performance, and stability you will see in a production environment. Many of the problems that may exist in -CURRENT will be induced by specific types of load. Race conditions, Lock Order Reversal, and certain driver issues in many cases, only appear under particularly heavy loads, or particular types of load. What this means, simply, is that when you test the next version of -CURRENT you'd like to run, there's quite a bit of testing you'll have to do. Along side this type of problem, is the issue of security. If you are running -CURRENT as of 2 weeks ago, and a security vulnerability is discovered, in some cases, you will be compelled to upgrade to the latest -CURRENT, even if it has known stability problems, or performance/functionality regression. None of this should be construed to imply that -CURRENT cannot be run in production, only that you really should have a compelling reason to do so... or at the very least, quite a bit of free time. --- Harrison GrundyReceived on Sun Dec 17 2006 - 15:07:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC