Astrodog wrote: > The kind of testing needed in -CURRENT is controlled, in my opinion. You are, of course, welcome to your opinions. You will, of course, please make allowances for the facts that, A) You might be wrong, and B) Even if you are right within some limited sphere, your knowledge and experience only extend so far, and others who have different knowledge and/or experience may not find them useful. For example, as a FreeBSD developer I am always quite gratified when people run my -current code in a real world environment, since I find anecdotes useful. Of course I'd always rather hear, "It works!" but even if the answer is that it doesn't work, it gives me a direction to look in that I didn't have before. So let me summarize. Yes, there are potential problems with running -current in production. As I said very early in this thread, the safest way of doing so is to run -current on a limited number of systems, and have -stable hardware ready to swap in if needed. The OP says he understands the issues at hand, and is willing to jump into the deep end of the pool. He seems like a grown-up to me, let's leave him alone and move on to other things, shall we? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protectionReceived on Sun Dec 17 2006 - 21:28:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC