On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:39:14PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 01:00:56PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > > As I said, this is something that I hope to revisit in the next few days. > > However, it would be helpful if you could tell me the arguments and call > > path to the ipcperm() function instance that's generating the improper > > failure. It could be that both a bug in ipcperm() and a big in shmget() > > This is kernel debug running test from t-shm.c which fails (from root). Is > it what you need? > > acc_mode 0x1b0 > owner > obj_mode 0x9b0 > dac_granted 0x1180 > priv_granted 0x0 > EACCES Any reaction? -- http://ache.pp.ru/Received on Thu Dec 21 2006 - 22:55:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC