Re: MFC of bump in libcom_err.so another mistake?

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote:

>
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote:
> >>
> >> The point I am making is that this is in the -STABLE tree, not the -
> >> CURRENT tree.  There is no bump of libc and I don't see any reason
> >> for the libcom_err.so revision bump in -STABLE.  IMHO, it didn't make
> >> sense.
> >
> > I don't think it was -stable at the time.  It was probably
> > 6.0-current and the version bump occurred just before the
> > release.  As a -current user, you are expected to be able
> > to deal with this and rebuild all your ports if necessary.
>
>
> This is EXACTLY what I am saying.  I am not a -current user, I am a -
> stable user and this happened about a week ago or so.  It was
> libcom_err.so.2.1 until just recently.

Where is the commit that did this?  I only see revision 1.2.14.1
of src/lib/Makefile.inc which was committed July 22, 2005:

  revision 1.2.14.1
  date: 2005/07/22 17:29:02;  author: kensmith;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -1
  Insta-MFC of the shared library version bump.  All shared libraries
  whose version has not already been bumped since RELENG_5 are being
  bumped.

  Revisions of files being MFC-ed:

That was prior to 6.0 being -stable, not after.  And freefall has
been at 6.0-stable since Dec 10th:

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/libcom_err*
  -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  3940 Dec 10 03:21 /usr/lib/libcom_err.a
  lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel    15 Dec 10 03:21 /usr/lib/libcom_err.so -> libcom_err.so.3
  -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  5544 Dec  9 21:38 /usr/lib/libcom_err.so.2
  -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel  5544 Dec 10 03:21 /usr/lib/libcom_err.so.3

so it hasn't happened in the last week or so.  You must have something
wrong on your end.

-- 
DE