(cc'd to current) On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:54:56PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > Steve Kargl [sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu] wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 11:44:27AM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: >>> Steve Kargl writes: >>>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 10:47:52AM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: >>>>> WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. >>>>> Memory modified after free 0xffffff0000006d00(248) val=5 _at_ >>>>> 0xffffff0000006dd0 >>>>> kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled >>>> >>>> You can trigger this panic without the red zone stuff. >>>> See my string of post from yesterday. Something went >>> >>> Your panic looks like the same panic as mine, but with memguard rather >>> than redzone. These systems do similar things, I suppose it is only >>> natural that they'd be hit by the same bug. >> >> You get it without memguard, too. Kris suggested that I try memguard >> to capture the problem. Unfortunately, memguard actually made >> matters worse in that I did not even make it to single user mode >> before a panic. > > Odd. I do not get it without using either memguard or redzone. > I have a (mostly generic) kernel with WITNESS & INVARIANTS > that boots fine. > > Maybe we should move this to -current or -amd64, as it does not > seem to be directly related to this commit.. The system boots without memguard or redzone here as well. However, I can panic the system with any significant load and filesystem activity. Currently, a "make buildworld" with a "gmake check-gfortran" in a GCC build tree will kill my system. -- SteveReceived on Wed Feb 01 2006 - 17:46:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:51 UTC