Andre Oppermann writes: > Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Why dooes machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=1 drop my 10GbE network rx > > performance by a considerable amount (7.5Gbs -> 5.5Gbs)? <...> > This may be the same problem OpenBSD has fixed last year in the handling > of the idle loop. From the kerneltrap posting: <....> > First commit message: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=111692513727274&w=2 > > The MFC with all changes in one commit message: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=111859519015510&w=2 The bug they fixes was missing interrupts by both calling APM's idle routine, which may hlt, and hlt'ing in the idle loop itself. Since I have no idea what acpi is doing, I got excited about this. Alas, it seems like this isn't it. I pointed cpu_idle_hook back to cpu_idle_default and away from acpi_cpu_idle, but that made no difference. DrewReceived on Mon Feb 06 2006 - 18:46:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:52 UTC