On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 07:06:42AM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <20060207230142.GD32998_at_comp.chem.msu.su>, Yar Tikhiy writes: > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:34:16AM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > In message <20060207182755.GB32998_at_comp.chem.msu.su>, Yar Tikhiy writes: > > > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:06:32AM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > > > In message <20060207173154.GE19674_at_comp.chem.msu.su>, Yar Tikhiy writes > > : > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 08:29:35PM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > > > > cwtest# /usr/local/bin/cpuid > > > eax in eax ebx ecx edx > > > 00000000 00000001 756e6547 6c65746e 49656e69 > > ^^ > > > 00000001 0000052c 00000000 00000000 000001bf > > > > Thanks for getting these data! They tell that your CPU doesn't > > support CPUID functions above 0x01, which is completely OK for > > a Pentium. > > > > Would you mind giving a try to the attached patch? It should fix > > the CPUID 0x02 issue while reducing code duplication. > > The patch fixes the problem and more elegantly than mine did. > > When this is committed, PR 92977 should be closed. All done! -- YarReceived on Thu Feb 09 2006 - 08:17:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:52 UTC