On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 05:41:38PM +0000, Vladimir Konrad wrote: > is it viable to have a memtest like process running full-time (low > priority) or scheduled, on running FreeBSD system to discover bad memory > sooner than a later (without taking the system off-line)? Imho this is not the right way to do it. > being on the receiving end of a bad memory module (FreeBSD did random > reboots, checked the memory with memtest and there it was), it would be > nice if the OS could spot this. According to my experience, if memory goes bad slowly or does not match the mainboard specificatin (or vice versa), you might not find anything with memtest, whilst a buildworld might give signal 11 within a few minutes. Having said that, if you need a reliable plattform, then ECC-memory on a good server board - or even memory in Raid 1 - might be worth considering. Then you only need to monitor the hardware health to know if memory goes bad, and you still have some time to replace it. Regards, Holger KippReceived on Tue Feb 14 2006 - 17:40:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:52 UTC