Am Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:05:49 -0500 schrieb Joel Gunderson <jdgunder_at_purdue.edu>: > Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >I haven't tested it, but someone suggested in private mail to use > >"hosts: files [success=return] dns" (he told me this is the way linux > >distributions are doing this) which suggests that the documented > >default criteria in nsswitch.conf(5) doesn't work. Can you test if this > >work-around works? > I tried the "hosts: files [success=return] dns" in nsswitch, but it > didn't work. I'll have to get back to you on the upgrade thing...if for Ah, ok. One datapoint more. > some reason the machine flips out on the update I don't have time to fix > it before checkoffs. Plus my group members would kill me. Don't risk your grade for this (this doesn't mean an update will break something, but no need to "enjoy" a bad feeling when you're not sure 100% yourself). Bye, Alexander. -- Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 WL http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/registry/1FZ4DTHQE9PQ8/ref=wl_em_to/Received on Sun Feb 19 2006 - 11:45:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:52 UTC