On Wednesday 22 February 2006 11:20, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:01:39AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > Is it more or less than before the patch? Also, what happens if you just back > > Less than (for me). So the patch was a net improvement? > > The pagezero ones are truly odd. calcru() shouldn't be called for kthreads > > very often (if at all). I wonder if your tickrate is changing out from under > > you. Try editing sys/i386/i386/tsc.c and where it does 'set_cputicker(rdtsc, > > tsc_freq, 1)' change the last parameter to '0' and see if they go away. > > May it interfere with ntpd activity? I have those log lines in one chunk: > Feb 22 03:36:43 pobrecita ntpd[422]: time reset +0.622691 s > Feb 22 03:36:43 pobrecita ntpd[422]: kernel time sync disabled 2041 > Feb 22 03:37:45 pobrecita kernel: calcru: runtime went backwards from 292542 usec to 292537 usec for pid 29 (pagezero) > Feb 22 03:37:45 pobrecita kernel: u 0:0/0 s 38:292542/292537 i 0:0/0 It should not affect ntp. It is just about the usage calculations for processes, not related to timekeeping or wall time. -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Wed Feb 22 2006 - 17:20:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:52 UTC