Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 03:11:02PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote: > >>I have unfortunately lost all of my voodoo hardware. >> >>On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 09:17:24AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: >> >>>Yar Tikhiy wrote: >>> >>>>Hi there, >>>> >>>>In the course of reviewing and cleaning up the default configuration >>>>of kernel options, it was suggested by the Release Engineers that >>>>we had a separate module for TDFX_LINUX instead of placing the >>>>burden on the device tdfx and module 3dfx. Could anybody interested >>>>test this change? I've made sure it builds, but I have no 3dfx hw >>>>to really test it. The testing is as simple as building the new >>>>3dfx and 3dfx_linux modules, loading them, and verifying that the >>>>linux apps work with the device as before. Thanks in advance! >>>> >> >>Sounds goo to me. I am all for further modularization of the codebase. > > > Thanks! > > >>>Why keep the TDFX_LINUX option defined in sys/conf/options? >> >>Sounds good to me. In the event that you want to build this statically >>into the kernel, doesn't the option still need to be available, >>or are we talking about a device tdfxlinux ? > > > It was exactly my point, too: the TDFX_LINUX option has to be there > so that people still can compile device tdfx with Linux support into > the main kernel file. > It's a little confusing though since it's now treated as a separate driver. ScottReceived on Mon Feb 27 2006 - 13:32:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:52 UTC