Coleman Kane wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:13:05PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > >>On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 03:11:02PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote: >> >>>Sounds good to me. In the event that you want to build this statically >>>into the kernel, doesn't the option still need to be available, >>>or are we talking about a device tdfxlinux ? >> >>It was exactly my point, too: the TDFX_LINUX option has to be there >>so that people still can compile device tdfx with Linux support into >>the main kernel file. > > > Not to mention so that they can omit said functionality if it is not > desired. I believe that the kmod by default compiles this in though. > > >>-- >>Yar Ok, I envisioned this as: device tdfx device tdfxlinux # Optional Linux compatibility I don't have a strong opinion on it, and I'll defer to whatever Coleman and Yar think is most appropriate. SCottReceived on Mon Feb 27 2006 - 16:58:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:52 UTC