Re: New malloc ready, take 42

From: David Xu <davidxu_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 14:10:12 +0800

Kris Kennaway wrote:

>Yeah, a factor of >10 improvement is not credible.  Perhaps you meant
>216xx?
>
>Kris
>  
>
Sorry, my typo, it is 216xx.

David Xu

Received on Sun Jan 01 2006 - 05:10:05 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: New malloc ready, take 42"
In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: New malloc ready, take 42"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:50 UTC