On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:34:00PM +0600, Victor Snezhko wrote: V> > G> I have managed to trigger two panics by doing ifconfig ppp0 destroy while V> > G> ppp was running. V> > V> > Kernel ppp(4) is known to have problems. At least there are problems with V> > interaction of Giant-locked tty layer and Giant-less network layer. V> > V> > I'd recommend you to use user-level ppp(8), or mpd, which routes traffic V> > through kernel ng_ppp(4). V> V> I may be mistaken, but I saw pppd in the panic report, isn't it an V> indication of user-level ppp? pppd(8) is a daemon that controls kernel level PPP. ppp(8) is a daemon implementing PPP in userland. V> P.S.: I'm using user-level ppp(it comes before kernel one in the V> handbook :)) and I am lucky enough not to experience any problem since V> I switched to -current in November (besides INET6-caused one, which is V> now fixed). Thanks for notice, though. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPEReceived on Tue Jan 10 2006 - 09:36:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:50 UTC