On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Peter Carah wrote: PC>Harti Brandt wrote: PC>> This should been fixed now (by building a shareable libdisk). PC>> PC>> harti PC>> PC> PC>I waited several days before sending this query, just in case a fix came in. PC>It didn't until late today (I cvsup'd this morning and it didn't come yet). PC> PC>Then why did it build just fine on i386, and fail (on my only 2 samples) only PC>on amd64. (I have a sparc64 but at the moment it doesn't run fbsd so I can't PC>tell if it matters there or not...) Perhaps the 32-bit arch only supports PC>relocations that are common between shared and not? Or that gcc doesn't try to PC>get too fancy? PC> PC>I do understand the fix and all, just curious as to why it didn't PC>matter on i386. It seems that amd64 relocation is different from, for example, sparc64 and doesn't allow to link non-pic static libraries into a shared object. hartiReceived on Thu Jan 12 2006 - 10:35:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:50 UTC