On 1/12/06, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Thursday 12 January 2006 09:09 am, Doug Rabson wrote: > > On 11 Jan 2006, at 22:05, David Leimbach wrote: > > > On 1/11/06, Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org> wrote: > > >> alan bryan wrote: > > >>> I read that the new Intel (x86) Macs use EFI rather > > >>> than the traditional PC Bios to boot up. I'm > > >>> interested in using one of these to multiboot OS X and > > >>> FreeBSD and am wondering if it is yet known to work or > > >>> not. Do any changes need to be made to FreeBSD or > > >>> should it work out of the box? Thanks for any insight > > >>> and I know that it may be impossible to fully answer > > >>> until people get their hands on the hardware but I > > >>> just wanted to start thinking about the possibilities. > > >> > > >> well if they can boot Darwin I'm sure they can be hacked to boot > > >> FreeBSD. > > >> It would probabty require a different bootloader binary. > > > > > > I don't see what booting Darwin has to do with booting FreeBSD. > > > > > > However, since FreeBSD boots on IA64 using the FreeBSD bootloader > > > for IA64, > > > I *hope* it won't be much work to port whatever changes that > > > requires to > > > IA32. > > > > When I wrote the EFI bootloader for ia64, I spent a small amount of > > time trying to make it possible to port to an i386 EFI environment. I > > reckon it would only take a day or two to do the port. If someone > > donates a nice new 20" iMac to me, I'll even do the work :-) > > Same offer here, though dfr_at_ would probably get it working sooner. :) I might be picking one up this week... not sure yet. So conflicted over that or waiting to see what the new used to be a PowerMac will be. [Do I really want the mobile processor?] DaveReceived on Thu Jan 12 2006 - 21:34:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:50 UTC