Re: if_em panic

From: M. Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:33:27 -0700 (MST)
In message: <43C718EF.9050301_at_elischer.org>
            Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org> writes:
: Huang wen hui wrote:
: 
: >hi,
: >when I load if_em on TP42P got this panic:
: >  
: >
: 
: looks like the first interrupt occurs before the driver has finished
: setting itself up..
: (just a first impression).
: Scott'll probably nail it.
: 
: I'm guessing it works fine if compiled in..

Fast interrupts are not masked during device configuration, but slow
interrupts are.  This is why people are seeing this now.  Even if the
em device itself didn't interrupt, it is possible (likely) that other
devices that share an interrupt with it have...

Warner
Received on Sat Jan 14 2006 - 03:35:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:50 UTC