Le Friday 20 January 2006 10:52, Kris Kennaway a écrit : > Correct me if I'm wrong, but the stats aren't accounted to the parent > process either. I'm pretty sure I've seen situations where a thread > was using a lot of CPU, but if you believe top(1) then every process > in the system is idle (except for the fact that the system is 0% > idle). In this situation there's no way to tell which threaded > process is using resources. One work-around is to "nice" the specific process (nice 1 is enough, of course), then the "nice" component of "CPU states:" seems to reflect the real CPU use of a threaded process. TfHReceived on Fri Jan 20 2006 - 18:09:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:51 UTC