Re: kernel thread as real threads..

From: David Xu <davidxu_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:04:23 +0800
Julian Elischer wrote:

>
> Scott Long wrote:
>
>>
>> Does pthreads allow the programmer to name threads in a user and/or
>> kernel visible way?  Is this something that is really all that
>> important?
>
>
>
> There is a way,
> but it's more important for kernel threads.. it's nice to see which  
> is which.
> Even in user threads (1:1) if one thread is running away, it's nice to 
> see which one it is.
>
> We should have an interface on M:N thread sto allow a process to get 
> thread stats.. probably implemented as
> a management thread or something. (maybe the signal thread could do it).
>
>
I will implement pthread_set_name_np for libthr. but I am not sure you 
should
spend precious time on M:N again, it is already very diffcult to 
introduce a new
scheduler with current framework, putting more constrains only reduces 
chance
for such thing.
Received on Sat Jan 21 2006 - 00:04:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:51 UTC