Hi, I found a (somewhat old) post from gnn_at_ on this topic there : http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/net/2004-09/0289.html I also think that it would be a good idea to do it (at least, it would be easier to understand, because IFF_PPROMISC is not that explicit). If nobody has already done it, I'll work on this. There is another point on which I would appreciate to know your opinion: referring to if.c[1269], I understand that if IFF_PPROMISC is set in ifp->if_flags, IFF_PROMISC should be set to (or we are in a transient situation). It appears that if_ethersubr.c[652] is working in this case. Isn't it a mistake ? Thanks a lot ! -- Gregory (Forwarded here, because I got no answers on freebsd-net_at_)Received on Fri Jan 27 2006 - 11:47:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:51 UTC